For the last 5 years Citizens Against Legal Abuse has been filing complaints with no avail. We are seeking your intervention to achieve justice and fairness.
1. Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General of the United States (No response)
2. Nathaniel Williams, Sheriff of St. Helena Parish (No formal investigation or response)
3. Scott M. Perrilloux, District Attorney (21st Judicial) (No formal investigation or response)
4. James D. “Buddy” Caldwell, Attorney General State of Louisiana (We were told it was outside of their jurisdiction and we should contact the FBI. No investigation)
5. The St. Helena Parish Police Jury (No formal investigation)
6. Nancy Langworthy, Trial Attorney, Civil Rights Division, USDOJ (No formal investigation)
7. Jan K. King, F.H.A Section Chief, Office of Fair Housing & Equal Opportunity (No formal investigation, they felt the case was not within the statue of limitations)
8. Garry Sweeny, Regional Director, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (No formal investigation, they felt the case was not within the statue of limitations)
9. Governor Bobby Jindal (No investigation)
10. LA State Police (We were told that we had to prove criminal intent)
Citizens Against Legal Abuse, Inc. Blog
- Citizens Against Legal Abuse Blog
- New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
- Citizens Against Legal Abuse, Inc. Blog is a Non-Profit organization that is committed to helping those that cannot help themselves. Visit our website: http://www.ca-la.org/
Friday, September 16, 2011
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
All Arguements Are Unlawful - La CC Article 694
Citizens Against Legal Abuse, Inc.
A Non Profit Organization
P.O. BOX 51386
New Orleans, Louisiana 70151
A Non Profit Organization
P.O. BOX 51386
New Orleans, Louisiana 70151
July 18, 2011
An Open Letter Seeking Justice!
These cases are clear and prove that ROBA INC. cannot use any other route to access its property by law. All other arguments and possibilities are unlawful, see CC Article 694, which makes it mandatory and required that ROBA use the existing route previously exercised which is now blocked by a gate denying ROBA Access. Please see survey and the predial servitude of passage below. Click the survey to enlarge.
"Passage shall be furnished gratuitously by the owner of the land on which the passage was previously exercised, even if it is not the shortest route to the public road...."
(La CC Article 694)
(La CC Article 694)
Below you will find the survey and description of the existing road/right of way for ROBA INC.
Established by Notarial Act
February 12, 1974
By: Edwin C. Schilling, Jr. A Notary Public
All the previous and present court actions are frivolous and unlawful. The surveys and CC article 694 cannot be overruled in any shape, form or fashion.
The whole case is a cover-up of the criminal acts of the seller, notaries, and surveyor. Attorney Clifton T. Speed violated the public trust and violated his oath of office which is different from the civil case and it does not prescribe due to the on-going cover up.
The facts of the case clearly show: deed forgery, false surveys, falsified title opinions, injury to public record, malfeasance, obstruction of justice, conspiracy and fraud. We have provided more definitions and information that supports the ongoing conspiracy.
Laws, Definitions and Case Law Excerpts
LAW
CC 694
Art. 694. Enclosed estate; voluntary alienation or partition.
When in the case of partition, or a voluntary alienation of an estate or of a part thereof, property alienated or partitioned becomes enclosed, passage shall be furnished gratuitously by the owner of the land on which the passage was previously exercised, even if it is not the shortest route to the public road, and even if the act of alienation or partition does not mention a servitude of passage.Art. 694. Enclosed estate; voluntary alienation or partition.
Acts 1977, No. 514, §1.
Case Law Excerpts
DONALD JOSEPH SCEROLER, JR. AND PASHA MCDONALD SCEROLER
v.
VARDIE L. RANCHER, JR. AND SHEILA RANCHER CONSOLIDATED WITH LARRY BENARD MCDONALD AND PASHA MCDONALD SCEROLER
v.
VARDIE L. RANCHER, JR. AND SHEILA RANCHER
v.
VARDIE L. RANCHER, JR. AND SHEILA RANCHER CONSOLIDATED WITH LARRY BENARD MCDONALD AND PASHA MCDONALD SCEROLER
v.
VARDIE L. RANCHER, JR. AND SHEILA RANCHER
Appealed from the 21st Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of Livingston State of Louisiana Suit Numbers: 79,893 c/w 85,434 Honorable William F. Kline, Jr., Judge Ad Hoc
PREDIAL SERVITUDE OF RIGHT OF PASSAGE
The intention of the Civil Code articles allowing for the grant of a right of passage was to allow those people whose land is enclosed through no fault of their own to obtain a servitude of passage.
Article 694 is mandatorily applied when land becomes enclosed as a result of a voluntary alienation such as a sale, exchange, donation, subdivision or any other transaction that involves transfer of ownership. See A. N. Yiannopoulos, Predial Servitudes § 103, at 297-298, 4 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise (2d ed. 1997). Yiannopoulos observes, "[i]n all cases, the right to demand a gratuitous passage is accorded to one who acquires an enclosed estate as a result of a voluntary alienation ... of property." Yiannopoulos, Predial Servitudes § 103, at 297-298.
Although plaintiffs would clearly prefer to access the much closer public road (Rancher Drive) through the Ranchers' property, Article 689 only applies if the owner of the enclosed estate "has no access to a public road." If the owner of the enclosed estate is entitled to a gratuitous servitude of passage over "the land on which passage was previously exercised, even if it is not the shortest route to the public road," under Article 694, then technically Article 689 does not apply. The "access to a public road" is available over the land on which the passage was previously exercised. Thus, where a gratuitous passage is available under Article 694, an enclosed landowner is not entitled to an Article 689 servitude across a neighbor's land.
Furthermore, the obligation of the McDonalds to furnish a gratuitous passage to Henderson Road arises as a result of a legal servitude in favor of the land on which the passage was previously exercised.
Thus, the Scerolers, as owners of property burdened with a legal servitude of passage, are also obligated to grant Ben McDonald a gratuitous passage over their property to the McDonald's tract in order to access Henderson Road.
The trial court correctly concluded that unless the plaintiffs could show an exception to the general rule that they must avail themselves of the gratuitous right of passage over the McDonalds' property to Henderson Road, they may not compel their neighbors (the Ranchers) to provide them with access to the closer Rancher Drive, thereby burdening the Ranchers' property.
Article 694 dictates that where a passage has been exercised in the past, the owner of the land upon which the right of passage was previously exercised is bound to furnish a gratuitous passage.
We conclude, as did the trial court, that plaintiffs must avail themselves of the gratuitous right of passage under Article 694 to Henderson Road through their donor's property. Thus, plaintiffs' first three assignments of error are without merit.
Case Law Excerpts
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
06-732
BESSIE MAE TYLER, ET AL.
VERSUS
LUTHER HOLLOWAY, ET AL.
********** APPEAL FROM THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF CATAHOULA, NO. 22,899A HONORABLE CHARLES A. TRAYLOR, II, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** J. DAVID PAINTER JUDGE
06-732
BESSIE MAE TYLER, ET AL.
VERSUS
LUTHER HOLLOWAY, ET AL.
********** APPEAL FROM THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF CATAHOULA, NO. 22,899A HONORABLE CHARLES A. TRAYLOR, II, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** J. DAVID PAINTER JUDGE
Public Road
With regard to the dedication of public roads, La.R.S. 48:491 provides, in pertinent part, that:
(1)(a) All roads and streets in this state which have been or hereafter are kept up, maintained, or worked for a period of three years by the authority of a parish governing authority within its parish, or by the authority of a municipal governing authority within its municipality, shall be public roads or streets, as the case may be, if there is actual or constructive knowledge of such work by adjoining landowners exercising reasonable concern over their property.
In order to establish public maintenance of the road under the statute, it is necessary to show definitively that work was performed on 5the road by a public entity and approximately when that work was performed.
Even where the road serves only as a driveway for one person or tract of land, public maintenance creates a right of use in the nature of a predial servitude for the benefit of the public. Gatson v. Bailey, 39,835 (La.App. 2 Cir. 6/29/05), 907 So.2d. 859. “In such cases, the tacitly-dedicated roads provide rights tantamount to actual predial servitudes protecting the dominant estate owners at the end of these roads, whose property might otherwise be enclosed.” Id. at. 863.
Law
RS 14:26
SUBPART E. INCHOATE OFFENSES
§26. Criminal conspiracy
A. Criminal conspiracy is the agreement or combination of two or more persons for the specific purpose of committing any crime; provided that an agreement or combination to commit a crime shall not amount to a criminal conspiracy unless, in addition to such agreement or combination, one or more of such parties does an act in furtherance of the object of the agreement or combination. SUBPART E. INCHOATE OFFENSES
§26. Criminal conspiracy
If the intended basic crime has been consummated, the conspirators may be tried for either the conspiracy or the completed offense, and a conviction for one shall not bar prosecution for the other.
B. Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit any crime shall be fined or imprisoned, or both, in the same manner as for the offense contemplated by the conspirators; provided, however, whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not more than thirty years.
C. Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit any other crime shall be fined or imprisoned, or both, in the same manner as for the offense contemplated by the conspirators; but such fine or imprisonment shall not exceed one-half of the largest fine, or one-half the longest term of imprisonment prescribed for such offense, or both.
Amended by Acts 1977, No. 538, §1.
Law
RS 14:134
CORRUPT PRACTICES
§134. Malfeasance in office
NOTE: §134 eff. until Aug. 15, 2011. See Acts 2010, No. 811, §1.CORRUPT PRACTICES
§134. Malfeasance in office
Malfeasance in office is committed when any public officer or public employee shall:
(1) Intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, as such officer or employee; or
(2) Intentionally perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or
(3) Knowingly permit any other public officer or public employee, under his authority, to intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, or to perform any such duty in an unlawful manner.
Any duty lawfully required of a public officer or public employee when delegated by him to a public officer or public employee shall be deemed to be a lawful duty of such public officer or employee. The delegation of such lawful duty shall not relieve the public officer or employee of his lawful duty.
Whoever commits the crime of malfeasance in office shall be imprisoned for not more than five years with or without hard labor or shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars or both.
NOTE: §134 as amended by Acts 2010, No. 811, §1, eff. Aug. 15, 2011.
A. Malfeasance in office is committed when any public officer or public employee shall:
(1) Intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, as such officer or employee; or
(2) Intentionally perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or
(3) Knowingly permit any other public officer or public employee, under his authority, to intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, or to perform any such duty in an unlawful manner.
B. Any duty lawfully required of a public officer or public employee when delegated by him to a public officer or public employee shall be deemed to be a lawful duty of such public officer or employee. The delegation of such lawful duty shall not relieve the public officer or employee of his lawful duty.
C.(1) Whoever commits the crime of malfeasance in office shall be imprisoned for not more than five years with or without hard labor or shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars, or both.
(2) In addition to the penalty provided for in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection, a person convicted of the provisions of this Section may be ordered to pay restitution to the state if the state suffered a loss as a result of the offense. Restitution shall include the payment of legal interest at the rate provided in R.S. 13:4202.
Amended by Acts 1980, No. 454, §1; Acts 2002, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 128, §6; Acts 2010, No. 811, §1, eff. Aug. 15, 2011.
Monday, May 16, 2011
Corruption and Fraud Committed by Assistant District Attorney & Co-Conspirators
Summary
ROBA INC., an African American owned company purchased property in St. Helena Parish on a historical road from James Courtney. ROBA INC., has been deprived access to the property and landlocked as a result of corruption and fraud of the public record, committed by Attorney Clifton T. Speed and his co-conspirators.
Our company met with St. Helena Parish Police Jury on May 26,2009 to address this issue, as well as informing the public of the fraud committed by Attorney Clifton T. Speed. We would like to know if your property has been stolen by trusted public officials through fraud, misrepresentation and corruption under color of law. Please contact us with your story or to request any additional information you may need.
Please see the exhibits (1-4) below that show the sale and petition of the previous owners which included clear and unambiguous language that states the “owners of the lake property shall have a right of way along the existing road, from state highway to the lake….” However when the African American company ROBA Inc., purchased from James B. Courtney in 1988 and 1992, deeds and surveys did not show any improvements, nor traditional boiler plate language
"That a certain piece or portion of ground, together with all the buildings and improvements thereon and all of the rights, ways,privileges, servitude, appurtenances and advantages thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, situated.."
in the documents executed.
Click each link to view each exhibit:
-This exhibit shows the courtney succession and conveyance record filed in St. Helena Parish Clerk of Court Office. Notice page 2 of the document that clearly states "Owners of the Lake Property shall have a right of way, from State Highway to the Lake, along the existing roadway leading from Highway to Lake."
The second purchase made by ROBA Inc., Act of Sale executed in 1992 not only excluded the traditional boiler plate language, Attorney Clifton Speed inserted “materially” inaccurate language which stated “there is no right of way associated with the sale of this property” after the sale closing was finalized. The official chain of title and therein recorded false title information and history (in the clerk of court) of property acquired, purchased and sold.
Please compare Attorney Clifton Speed's title of opinions (See Exhibit 7 and 8).
Exhibit 8 is the December 3, 2004 title of opinion of the white family shows all of ROBA’s rights, improvements, privileges and etc, all of which should have been included in ROBA’s title of opinion in 1992 (See Exhibit 7) but were intentionally excluded from ROBA’s Title of Opinion.
Exhibit 8 is the December 3, 2004 title of opinion of the white family shows all of ROBA’s rights, improvements, privileges and etc, all of which should have been included in ROBA’s title of opinion in 1992 (See Exhibit 7) but were intentionally excluded from ROBA’s Title of Opinion.
It is obvious that the sale in 1988 and 1992 was in keeping with the 1920’s covenants in hearted every deed of sale that denied sales of property in white neighborhoods to black citizens. Clifton Speed along with his co conspirators are determine to use the court and public records to deny all black citizens their constitutional right.
Despite the full knowledge and absolute proof of Clifton Speeds deliberate civil, criminal, malfeasance, notarial violations, falsifying the public record violating his oath of office. Not one officer of the court or judgment have address the proven fact that this whole court action is cc art1953 fraud.
Only one court has recognized the fraudulent actions in this case and ordered the falsified sales corrected as of this date the order of judgment has not been carried out and is in contempt of court.
Friday, May 6, 2011
The Full Story
Historical Mapping of
IDLE ACRES ROAD
Taken from the Courtney Succession
1974-Present
“This Picture is Worth a Thousand Words”
CONTACT:
Citizens Against Legal Abuse
PO Box 51386
New Orleams, LA 70151
CALegalabuse@gmail.com
985-240-9320
St. Helena Parish Police Jury
And All Interested Parties
THIS LETTER CONCERNS THE 911
EMERGENCY MAP PUBLISHED BY ST.
HELENA PARISH POLICE JURY
WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A VIOLATION OF
THE 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION WHERE BLACK PEOPLE’S
OWNERSHIP AND ENJOYMENT OF THEIR PROPERTY THE
SAME AS WHITES IS BEING DENIED UNDER COLOR OF
LAW
Police Jury Meeting: May 26, 2009
Citizens Against Legal Abuse
New Orleans, Louisiana
985-240-9320
ROBA, INC.
Civil Rights Investigation Property Fraud
Request For Investigation Into Falsely Published Information In 911 Booklet Which Contains Materially False Information About Idle Acres Road
Requested By:
ROBA, INC. Officials
To
St. Helena Parish Police Jury
Preface
ROBA,INC. is an African American Company owned and operated by a Black family
With officers and investors from other walks of life. ROBA, INC. consists of operations which involves general contracting and investing in projects throughout the State of Louisiana and out of Louisiana. ROBA, INC., objective includes but is not limited to the improvement of the lot of all Americans. ROBA, INC. has building and humanitarian projects ongoing for the betterment of citizens who want to help themselves. ROBA, INC. helps to train people in the business and contracting fields and has worked to provide employment while doing so. ROBA, INC. purchased a plot of land in St. Helena property in 1988 and again in 1992 with a spacious lake that provides an outlet for its staff and others. ROBA’s land purchase while made in good faith was met with contrite minds and power brokers who desired to keep ROBA, INC. locked into a property dilemma which would keep the company from maximizing on its investments.
The lake purchased by ROBA, INC., provides opportunities for fishing, swimming, camping and general access for various objectives including but not limited to hunting and nature enjoyment.
Through a series of investigative projects, after having experienced the fact that although ROBA, INC., purchased its property before the whites purchased any of their property from the dominant estate of the James B. Courtney family, ROBA, learned that a gate that was put by one of those families belonging to William Joe Hall, was put up in violation of ROBA’s property rights. Rights that were hidden through a series of legal and technical maneuvers engineered by an attorney, a surveyor and others including James B. Courtney to deprive ROBA, INC. of its rights to the property it purchased from the Courtney estate beginning in 1988 and again in 1992; these acts were done in violation of Louisiana and United States Laws which prohibits the taking of property from Americans citizens without due process of law . Further, ROBA’s rights were violated under civil rights laws which were put in place to protect African Americans from whites who took their property during slavery time by use of force, threat and a Jim Crow laws. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 as Amended in 1964, 1965, 1981, and again in 1991 protects African Americans from the majority population (white America) use of clandestine legal tactics to deprive them of their rights. Title 42 U.S.C. 1983 and its related progeny affords African Americans an opportunity to seek redress of violations of their rights by those who would use Jim Crow and (now) disguised legal tactics to deprive them of their rights. Please find attached an appendix of events which are true and maybe verified under seal of oath against those that are named herein for their role in attempting to deprive ROBA, INC. (an African American Family Corporation) of its rights to the property that it purchased in 1988 and again in 1992, by using disguised legal tactics to fool the owners that they did not have a right to a road identified as IDLE ACRES ROAD/LANE .
As the reader will see, Idle Acres Road/Lane has existed forever was conveyed by title to the legatees through the Courtney Succession and purchased by ROBA,INC. Louisiana Law governs how property is sold, conveyed or otherwise provided to another party by law.
ROBA purchased the rights of James B. Courtney whose rights included but was not limited to the ownership of IDLE ACRES ROAD/LANE, but a document prepared by Attorney Clifton Speed, who was and is currently assistant district attorney also attorney for St. Helena Parish Police Jury who prepared the title abstract for ROBA, INC., as well as those for the white family purchasers materially left out ownership language, in fact changed the chain of title which has deprived ROBA, INC. of their property rights for years. Through a series of investigations ROBA, INC. has uncovered the full plot, even where St. Helena Parish Government has become [in the view of ROBA,INC.] an unwilling participant in a cover up to replace Idle Acres Road/Lane with another identity that would forever deprive ROBA, INC., its representatives, agents, heirs, assigns and man dataries of their Louisiana and United States Constitutional rights.
APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS PAGE [1]
1. Courtney Succession and James B. Courtney Purchase which established James B. Courtney, ownership of all Courtney Property Interest including but not limited to Idle Acres Road/Lane.
B. James B. Courtney Acquisition of Property from
2. ROBA, INC. Property Purchase From James B. Courtney
(No improvements Included in Survey, nor Title, prepared by attorney Peter Scott Michelle and Surveyor Wallace Adams) Property description) In-spite of the fact that the property which was sold to ROBA, INC., included the following:
1. 40 foot road for ingress and egress
2. 3600 Square Foot Barn
3. The first survey by Wallace was completed contrary to and in violation of Louisiana Survey Standards as are memorialized in the Title 46, LXI Chapter 29. (Click the link below to view)
![Survey 2- By G. L. Lessard [2006]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOUP6raiP49YImmKK-neJzJV89FUQ0uzfH4HvVMNbWGhgzGWl45_nJ68bXtU-uD7kva0DecB3Qh_ZOmi62ljd2E-Nk7S4zkVZ6I3rRhV-45sJb_4G0w2nT6WKn6aJO4vCGeukyG-Jw9A/s1600/Survey_Corrected_Roba1_Nov242010_Pic2.jpg){kind=link}
Idle Acres/Road/Lane clearly visible throughout ROBA's Property.
G. L. Lessard, Sr.'s survey materially demonstrated that Wallace survey was not done according to Louisiana Survey Standards; had it been done so, Wallace survey would have shown ROBA’s property right and ownership.
A. Attorney Clifton Speed materially omitted proper title language and property ownership interest in Idle Acres Road/Lane that should have been in the ROBA’s Title Opinion. Which includes the absence of the north south Idle Acres Road/Lane access from the 10 acre lake south to public road 1047 north. ROBA’s ownership interest of Idle Acres Road/Lane was clearly memorialized in the Courtney Title of ownership filed in St. Helena Parish Conveyance Records… Book 88, P. 89
Clifton Speed Title Opinion falsely stated that ROBA, INC. had no access to a public road, but filed a judgment of possession on 2/19/1992 which showed ROBA’s access.
B. Attorney Clifton Speed Possessed Copy Of Judgment Of Possess From Tangipahoa Parish Which ’Clearly” Showed Idle Acres Road/Lane and ROBA, INC. property to said road memorialized in the judgment of possession. The judgment of possession was executed on 2/19/1992 and filed in St. Helena Parish, on the same day of attorney Clifton Speed’s declaration to ROBA, INC. and the public record that ROBA, INC. did not have “access to a public road”.
Note: Attorney Clifton Speed only hours before promulgation of the [untrue fact] that ROBA, INC. had no ownership right of way to a public road; had filed in the public record for the Parish of St. Helena the fact that James B. Courtney (based on Courtney’s purchase from his siblings and mother) owned a road identified as Idle Acres Road/Lane.
On April 16, 2010 the court ordered James B. Courtney correct ROBA's Title, which as of today, it still has not been corrected. See judgment below.
On April 16, 2010 the court ordered James B. Courtney correct ROBA's Title, which as of today, it still has not been corrected. See judgment below.
5. Attorney Clifton Speed Issued (yet) a new Title Opinion in 2004 for the white people ( who purchased property from the Courtney estate 10 years after ROBA’s purchase and whose property was serviced by Idle Acres Road/Lane), before the white family's purchased there part of the property, which included the following families:
(3) Tony Louis Noto, Jr. and family
who purchased property from the same dominant estate which included the front part of Idle Acres Road/Lane. Attorney Clifton Speed included in their title opinion the existence of the right of way and servitude associated with Idle Acres Road/Lane that he heretofore left out of the African American Title, Deeds, Surveys and property description that he knew or should have known was required to be there when ROBA purchased the property from James B. Courtney II.
5. The Aubrey Watson family used Idle Acres Road/Lane during this 10 year period to access his property on the opposite side of Courtney’s property. Before the road became a public road, Courtney did not allow the Watson family to use Idle Acres Road/Lane. The Watson family currently uses Idle Acres Road/Lane currently.
6. ROBA, INC. appointed Mr. Robert Lucien to consult with attorney Robert Taylerson regarding road property controversy; attorney Taylerson acting under the false title information done by attorney Clifton Speed filed a law suit based on specific performance on behalf of ROBA, INC. against James B. Courtney to force Courtney to comply with contract to grant right of way.
7. ROBA, INC., having been deceived by the materially false Title opinion rendered and memorialized by attorney Clifton Speed urged this law suit.
8. ROBA, INC. later learned that attorney Clifton Speed’s Title opinion was materially false and ask attorney Peter Scott Michelle for advice on how to remedy the problem.
9. Attorney Peter Scott Michelle pursued the same legal theory as Taylerson although attorney Peter Michelle was provided information to show that ROBA, INC., possessed a property right to the road known as Idle Acres Road/Lane from date of purchase in 1988; however, attorney Peter Michelle did not take the appropriate steps to correct the legal claim.
911 Discrepancies
10. A direct result of the cover up regarding ROBA, INC., rights to property has been the filing of false and untrue information in a parish directory design to make emergency communication and the location of people more accessible. Because a cover up started and is in place to deprive ROBA of its property rights, the Parish Commission adopted a 911 book that contains materially false information regarding a road that is not a road originally found in the maps and officials road identification text of the State of Louisiana. Tony Noto, Jr. Lane exist only for private use and does
not have any historical nor legal existence as a road and should not appear in the place of Idle Acres Road/Lane which has a long history of existence.
ROBA OWNED PROPERTY
(10) YEARS BEFORE WHITE PROPERTY OWNERS
BUT THROUGH FRAUD AND DECEIT HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF FUNDAMENTAL ACCESS AND USAGE OF SAID PROPERTY
11. The African American corporation known as ROBA, INC., first purchased property from the James B. Courtney in 1988. ROBA’s second purchase was made in 1992. All legal and proper public records reveal that ROBA has access to a 40 ft. wide road which runs from the lake south, (ROBA owns the lake and all property around it) to public road 1047 north. ROBA purchased all rights owned by James Courtney in 1988. William Joseph Hall, Mitchell Radecker and Tony Noto, Jr. families (who are white) purchased their property in 1998 with the road on it. Attorney Clifton Speed passed Joe Halls act of sale and memorialized the sale showing the existence of the road known as Idle Acres; however, ROBA's title opinion, researched and prepared by attorney Clifton Speed, did not include the (known) access to the public road 1047 which is due by law. Also, clearly, the white families purchased their properties subject to the right of way on the road known as Idle Acres Road possessed by ROBA.
** The above represents some of the most outrageous and despicable examples of blatant, open and direct discrimination in the history of St. Helena Parish. Also, this model shows how overt racism is practiced in the legal profession.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)